[Earth as Computation]
In the tapestry of human history, Indigenous civilizations intricately wove the data of the earth into the very fabric of their societies. Through a deep understanding of the land, they mastered the art of reading the “data” in dirt, using this knowledge to sustainably plan their communities. This harmonious relationship with the earth was a form of computation in itself, an early algorithm that dictated the rhythms of planting, harvesting, and living.
“Mud [...] has supplied the foundations for our human settlements and forms of symbolic communication. [...] These written decrees and urban plans have proven instrumental in marshaling the resources to bring settlements and cities into existence, molding cities from clay and codes and cables, and in regulating and standardizing the use of those resources.”1 The Indigenous use of natural materials was not just for construction but also as a language—a set of codes that communicated the balance between human needs and the earth’s offerings.
Contrast this with the arrival of European colonizers, who brought with them a drastically different interpretation of land and computation. The colonialists didn’t merely extract resources; they imposed a new order upon the land, carving it into organized grids centered around plazas and churches. This reshaping of the landscape was a physical manifestation of a new ideological and religious order, a stark departure from the indigenous approach.2 Their rigid urban planning represented a form of computation that prioritized domination over harmony, efficiency over sustainability. It was a system that sought to standardize and regulate, to mold the new world into the image of the old, disregarding the deeply embedded codes of the Indigenous relationship with the land.